1

The company is currently advertising land for development that their director, John Newhouse, is aware is not owned by their client. This situation raises significant ethical concerns as it appears to be an attempt to mislead potential buyers.
A developer has obtained planning permission to construct a three-bedroom house on land adjacent to my property by submitting inaccurate documentation to the council. These documents incorrectly delineated property boundaries and proposed the removal of trees that are on my property. The council has acknowledged these inaccuracies and is in the process of revoking the planning permission. Despite this, the developer continues to promote the land using these erroneous documents through Roseberry Newhouse.
I have formally requested that Roseberry Newhouse remove this misleading listing, citing the false nature of the advertisement. However, they have refused to take action, insisting they await confirmation from the same developer who submitted the incorrect information initially. I even provided them with the contact details of the council agent dealing with the issue to verify my claims, yet the listing remains active.
It is evident that Roseberry Newhouse does not prioritize the interests of their future customers or the welfare of the communities in which they operate. I strongly advise potential buyers to exercise caution when dealing with this company.
Buyer beware!
UPDATE
In the response from Roseberry Newhouse below, the owner acknowledges that the documents currently being used to advertise the land for sale are inaccurate, yet maintains that there is no intention to mislead anyone. I cannot think of a single reputable company that, after being informed they are selling misleading or stolen goods, would continue to do so!... Read more
18th Oct 2024 (16 weeks ago)