Agent shortlist
HouseWorth
Methodology and data
This page explains, in plain English, how GetAgent builds its estate agent comparison results, what data is used, what is not included, and how the service makes money.
Questions or corrections: hello@getagent.co.uk
At a glance
Purpose
Help sellers compare local high-street estate agents for homes like theirs.
Main inputs
Property listing data, sold-price data and the details you provide about your home.
Core factors
Local experience, speed of sale, asking-price performance where available, fees and service context.
Cost and commercial model
Free for homeowners. If a sale completes through a GetAgent introduced agent, the successful agent pays GetAgent a referral fee.
Personal data
Your details are only shared with agents once you agree.
Last reviewed
March 2026

Page details
Written by: Sam Edwards
Reviewed by: Arjun Bains
Last updated: 24 March 2026
When sellers ask who the best estate agent is, there is usually not one meaningful answer for the whole country. The more useful question is:
Core question
Which local agents have the strongest recent track record with homes like mine, in my area, for my needs?
GetAgent is designed to help sellers compare those local options more intelligently. It is not designed to replace your judgement. It is designed to help you build a better shortlist before you choose who to invite round, who to instruct, and what fee and terms you are willing to accept.
Different metrics have different levels of availability by market. For example, asking-price performance is more robust where reliable listing and outcome matching is available.
Start with your property and location
GetAgent uses the details you enter to understand what kind of home you are selling and where it is.
Find agents active around that location
The comparison looks for agents operating near your home who have listed similar properties recently.
Compare recent local track record
The service then compares agents using the core metrics described below.
Show you strong local options to compare
The goal is not to crown one national winner. The goal is to help you compare the local options most relevant to your home and priorities.
Swipe to view the full table.
| Metric | Plain-English definition | Why it matters | Important limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Local activity / local experience | How active the agent has been with similar listings around your home in a recent window | Active local agents often know pricing, buyer demand and objections better | A busy agent is not automatically a better communicator or negotiator |
| Time to agree a sale | How long listings typically take to go sold STC or be removed from the market | Helpful for sellers who want speed or a firmer timeline | Not every removal means a successful sale |
| Asking-price performance | How close outcomes are to the original asking price, where reliable data is available | Can help spot pricing accuracy and over-optimistic valuations | Not available in the same way for every market and should never be used in isolation |
| Fee quote | What the agent proposes to charge to sell your home | Lets sellers compare value as well as performance | Lowest fee is not always best value |
| Reviews and service context | Customer feedback and service information shown alongside the data | Useful for breaking ties between similar options | Reviews are subjective and can lag the current team or branch setup |
How active the agent has been with similar listings around your home in a recent window.
Active local agents often know pricing, buyer demand and objections better, but activity alone does not prove service quality.
How long listings typically take to go sold STC or be removed from the market.
Helpful if timing matters, but not every removal means a successful sale and local market conditions still matter.
How close outcomes are to the original asking price, where reliable data is available.
Useful for spotting pricing discipline, but it should never be used in isolation and coverage can vary by market.
What the agent proposes to charge to sell your home.
Fees help you compare value, but the lowest fee is not automatically the best result for your sale.
Customer feedback and service information shown alongside the data.
Useful for breaking ties between similar options, but reviews are subjective and can lag the current branch setup.
Some things matter hugely when choosing an estate agent, but are hard to measure fairly from market-wide data alone.
That is why GetAgent should help you build a shortlist, not make the final decision for you.
A data-led shortlist gets you to a better starting point. The valuation visit helps you judge whether the recommended asking price is evidence-based, whether the agent has a credible launch plan, whether you trust the person and the process, what is included in the fee, and what the tie-in and notice terms look like.
A sensible approach is to use GetAgent to narrow the field, then invite at least three agents to value your home.
GetAgent’s core comparison focuses on high-street estate agents. That is important context for anyone using this page to understand the results. Online and high-street agency models work differently, and seller involvement can vary significantly between them.
If you are considering an online agent, compare that route separately rather than assuming the same methodology applies directly.
GetAgent is free for homeowners to use. If a seller chooses an agent through GetAgent and the property sale completes, the successful estate agent pays GetAgent a referral fee. That is the commercial model that funds the service.
Disclosure
GetAgent should be clear that no market-wide property dataset is perfect. Possible limitations include duplicate listings created by agents on portals, imperfect matching between listings and completed sales, more complexity where multiple agents have been involved, and timing differences between live listing data and completed sale data.
That does not make the data useless. It means the right standard is useful and transparent, not perfect.
If you think something is wrong, please tell us at hello@getagent.co.uk and we will investigate.
GetAgent will update this page whenever a metric definition changes, coverage changes, shortlist rules change, major data sources change, or commercial disclosures change.
Version 1.0
First public methodology page published.
Last reviewed
March 2026
The comparison is designed to help you evaluate strong local options using recent market data and the details you provide about your home. You should use the full context, performance, fee, reviews, valuation quality and contract terms, rather than relying on one signal or one position in a list.
The core comparison focuses on high-street agents active on the major portals in the recent comparison window, with online-only models excluded from the core comparison.
Because the results depend on the details of the specific property (size, location, price) and the local comparison set, not just the general area.
Because selling a home well is not just about one number. Local experience, speed, relevance and seller priorities all matter too.
No market-wide comparison tool can promise that. The better promise is transparency about sources, definitions and limitations.
GetAgent is free for homeowners. If a property sale completes through an agent chosen via GetAgent, the successful agent pays GetAgent a referral fee.
No. Personal details will only be shared with the specific agents you select once you confirm that you want to proceed with a valuation.
Yes. The data helps you shortlist. The conversations help you judge the human fit, the plan and the terms.

Use GetAgent to build a stronger shortlist before you invite agents round.
See the comparison in action, then read the detail in our best estate agent hub page. Related policies: Privacy policy and terms of use.
Our lines are closed
We are a company registered in England & Wales, company number 09428979.
Copyright © 2026 GetAgent Limited